WoodCutTool Research
Woodworking Research and Open Datasets
Use reproducible benchmark data to understand plywood sheet yield before buying material. Every report publishes its inputs, assumptions, limitations, and downloadable CSV rather than presenting an unexplained headline number.
Plywood project yield benchmarks
75 common project parts lists tested on standard 4×8 sheets, with area-only minimums and heuristic sheet counts.
Read the report →40 runsSaw kerf and sheet-count impact
Ten repeated-cut patterns compared at zero, 1/16, 3/32, and 1/8 inch kerf to expose exact-fit failures.
Read the report →2 rotation modesGrain direction and panel rotation
The same 75 projects tested with rotation allowed and locked, plus practical guidance for visible plywood faces.
Read the report →1050 runsProject kerf sensitivity matrix
75 projects tested across 7 kerf settings and two orientation modes, with a row for every scenario.
Read the report →600 runsPlywood sheet format comparison
75 project inputs compared on 5×5, 4×8, 4×10, and 5×10 panels, including parts that do not fit a format.
Read the report →750 runsEdge trim allowance impact
75 project inputs tested with five per-edge trim margins and two orientation modes on nominal 4×8 sheets.
Read the report →5,250 runsPlywood layout robustness matrix
75 projects tested across kerf, edge-trim, and orientation combinations to detect fragile layouts and incomplete scenarios when they occur.
Read the report →225 runsPlywood purchase contingency benchmark
75 project inputs tested with no spare parts, one spare of the largest part, and one spare of every part type.
Read the report →Open a project-level cut list example
The Cut List Examples library turns the aggregate benchmark into 75 individual project pages. Each example publishes its parts, 4×8 sheet count, material yield, rotation comparison, layout diagram, source template, and downloadable CSV.
What makes these datasets useful
The reports answer narrow planning questions with explicit inputs. Project dimensions come from WoodCutTool’s public template library, and every layout uses the same deterministic MaxRects-style heuristic while one declared variable changes. The raw CSV files make it possible to inspect individual rows, reproduce summaries, or compare the estimates with another optimizer.
Provenance and production
These datasets are computed from WoodCutTool’s own planning examples; they are not scraped product specifications, copyrighted plans, customer files, or claims about market-wide outcomes. The generator, method version, input template URL, and limitations remain visible so automated production does not hide how a result was made.
What the results do not prove
These are planning benchmarks, not guaranteed purchase quantities or proof of a globally optimal layout. Real sheets can have damaged edges, voids, bow, trim loss, and defects. Joinery, hardware, test cuts, replacement pieces, face quality, and cut sequence can also increase material needs. Measure the stock and blade, validate every project dimension, and review the actual layout before purchasing or cutting.
Reuse and attribution
The downloadable datasets are licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may share and adapt them with attribution to WoodCutTool, a link to the source report, and an indication of changes.